The AI Readiness Gap: Why Organizations Are Unprepared

Artificial intelligence is no longer an emerging initiative. Organizations across all industries are deploying AI systems to accelerate workflows, enhance decision-making, and unlock competitive advantage.

Yet for all of AI’s promise, many organizations lack meaningful insight into how it’s governed and controlled.

This isn’t just a technical problem, it’s a leadership challenge.

“AI is showing up in organizations faster than most governance frameworks were built to manage,” says Shareth Ben, Chief Customer Officer at Apptega. “And when executives ask whether their organization is ready to use AI responsibly, many teams don’t have a structured way to answer.”

This disconnect between adoption and governance is emerging as a critical risk factor across sectors.

The Governance Gap Is Becoming a Business Risk

In mature risk management programs, governance mechanisms evolve alongside usage. But with AI, adoption often precedes oversight.

Teams deploy tools to accelerate analysis. Business units experiment with AI-driven automation. Vendors add AI capabilities by default.

And all of this is unfolding so quickly that formal governance, risk management, and accountability structures rarely keep pace.

This creates visibility gaps that can have real consequences, especially as regulatory scrutiny increases and boards begin asking hard questions about AI risk exposure.

As Dave Sampson, Vice President of Cyber Risk and Strategy at Thrive, noted during a recent Apptega-hosted webinar: “Readiness is certainly a challenge—and probably more of a challenge for many organizations than they may realize.”

Why Traditional Frameworks Fall Short for AI

When security leaders think about risk maturity, they often turn to established standards like NIST or ISO.

These frameworks are valuable, but they were designed before AI’s rapid rise and assume significant time and resource investment to adopt and operationalize.

For many organizations, especially mid-sized and growing enterprises, these comprehensive standards can be overwhelming as an initial step toward AI governance.

The result: many teams acknowledge the need for governance, but don’t have a practical way to get started.

As Ankur Sheth, former Senior Managing Director and Global Head of Cyber Risk at Ankura, recently observed: ”A lot of organizations deploy AI without understanding what they’re trying to achieve… step back and think through your goals and objectives first.”

The Strategic Value of Early Assessment

Organizations that take a structured approach to AI readiness gain several advantages:

1. Visibility Into Risk Across Functions
A comprehensive assessment helps teams identify where AI is being used, how it’s governed, and where gaps exist, rather than guessing based on anecdote or assumption.

2. Prioritization of Governance Efforts
Not all gaps are equal. A structured evaluation helps leaders distinguish urgent risks from areas where immediate investment may not be needed.

3. Common Language for Leadership Conversations
Risk discussions are most effective when grounded in data and structured insight, especially when communicating with boards or executive leadership.

4. Foundation for Ongoing Maturity
Readiness isn’t a one-time checkbox. It’s a baseline from which governance programs evolve, enabling iterative improvement over time.

Balancing Practicality and Rigor

Addressing AI readiness doesn’t require waiting for regulatory mandates or adopting the largest existing standards first. Organizations can benefit from frameworks that balance rigor with practicality, assessing what matters most first, then layering in more formal standards over time.

“At its core, readiness is about accountability and context,” reflects Shareth Ben. “If you can see where your organization stands and make informed decisions about where to focus your efforts, you’re already ahead of many peers.”

In this context, structured assessments and frameworks can play a role, not as an end in themselves, but as tools to inform strategy and reduce uncertainty.

For organizations looking to take a first structured step, readiness programs can serve as a practical foundation.

At Apptega, this has taken the form of an AI Readiness Assessment and Program available now in the platform, which is designed to help teams understand where they stand today, identify the highest-risk gaps, and implement a roadmap for responsible AI governance, without introducing unnecessary complexity.

Looking Ahead

As AI continues to reshape how work gets done, leadership teams must evolve governance programs with equal urgency.

Boards are asking about risk. Regulators are signaling expectations. Customers and partners are evaluating AI practices as part of trust and third-party risk.

Organizations that can answer these questions with clarity—not just aspiration—will be better positioned to manage risk and capitalize on AI’s potential.

Structured readiness assessments like the one offered by Apptega are one way to build that clarity, serving as a foundation for more comprehensive governance over time.

The goal is simple: understand where you are, identify where you need to be, and put governance in place that enables both innovation and confidence.

‍