Cookie-Einstellungen
schließen
One More Thing...

On March 18, don’t miss Build to Win, Apptega’s spring launch event for teams ready to assemble differentiated security, risk, and compliance services.

We’re unveiling:

  • New innovations that expand what you can build with Apptega
  • Real stories from teams setting their services apart
  • A few hidden extras (and rewards) for curious builders 👀

See how the right pieces, powered by automation and AI agents, can come together to elevate what you deliver. Grab your spot before registration fills up.

Save My SpotClose Icon

Introduction

KnowBe4 KCM End of Life: What It Means and What to Do Next

KnowBe4's KCM GRC Platform was a workhorse for a lot of compliance programs. Four modules, compliance, policy, risk, and vendor management, organized under one roof, priced accessibly for organizations that needed structure without enterprise overhead. For SMBs and mid-market teams that had not yet invested in a purpose-built GRC platform, KCM provided a functional starting point.

Then August 2, 2023 happened.

KnowBe4 announced it was sunsetting their KCM GRC solution. The platform completed its wind-down in 2024. For organizations that built their compliance programs on KCM, that created a real problem: a compliance platform with no active development, no security patches, no framework updates, and a vendor that had moved on.

This post explains what the KCM end of life means for your compliance program, what your migration options are, and how to think through the decision.

What Was KnowBe4 KCM?

KnowBe4 KCM, officially the KnowBe4 Compliance Manager and marketed as the KCM GRC Platform, was a SaaS-based governance, risk, and compliance tool developed by KnowBe4. It was designed to help organizations manage their compliance obligations through four core modules:

Compliance Management handled framework templates and control tracking. KCM maintained pre-built templates for common standards including SOC 2, HIPAA, HITRUST, ISO 27001, NIST Cybersecurity Framework, NIST 800-171, PCI-DSS, and CMMC. Organizations could scope frameworks to their environment, assign controls to team members, and collect evidence.

Policy Management provided a centralized place to create, version, and distribute internal security policies. Employees could acknowledge policies within the platform, creating an auditable record.

Risk Management enabled organizations to log risks, assign severity and likelihood scores, assign remediation owners, and track risk status over time.

Vendor Risk Management let teams send questionnaires to third-party vendors, track responses, and maintain a vendor risk register.

For organizations already using KnowBe4 for security awareness training, KCM represented a natural extension, managing the governance and compliance side alongside the human risk side.

What the KnowBe4 KCM End of Life Actually Means

"End of life" carries different implications depending on context. In a compliance program, the downstream consequences are specific.

No More Framework Updates

Compliance standards change. NIST CSF 2.0 was released in February 2024. CMMC 2.0 final rule dropped in December 2023. SOC 2 criteria get refreshed. An EOL platform does not receive those updates. If you are managing compliance in a tool frozen on 2023 framework versions, your control library is drifting out of alignment with what auditors and customers expect.

No Security Patches

This is the one most compliance professionals do not immediately think about: your GRC platform holds your risk register, control evidence, policy acknowledgments, and vendor questionnaire data. Running that on unpatched software is itself a risk, the exact kind your GRC program is supposed to help you prevent.

Integration Drift

Over time, the tools connected to your compliance workflows push API updates. KCM GRC will not keep pace with those changes. Integrations break silently, evidence collection develops gaps, and manual workarounds accumulate.

Audit Exposure

Auditors for SOC 2, HIPAA, and ISO 27001 increasingly ask about the integrity and current support status of the tools used to manage compliance evidence. "We are using a discontinued platform with no active vendor support" is not a comfortable position in an audit.

KCM GRC Replacement Options: How They Compare

Not every KCM customer maps cleanly onto Drata's target profile. Here is the landscape of replacement options and who each one fits:

Drata is strong for cloud-native organizations. Best for first-time SOC 2 or ISO 27001, primarily in-house teams, heavy cloud infrastructure. Pricing typically falls in the $25K to $50K per year range based on public community discussion.

Vanta shares a similar profile to Drata. Compliance automation with continuous monitoring and strong integrations. Built for fast-growing SaaS businesses.

ZenGRC is a better fit for risk-heavy GRC in established compliance teams, where risk management is the primary driver rather than compliance automation.

Apptega is purpose-built for organizations managing multiple compliance frameworks simultaneously, or operating compliance programs through MSSPs. The key differentiator is Apptega’s framework cross-walking, which crosswalks controls across frameworks so satisfying a control once satisfies it everywhere it applies. Apptega is designed for both in-house compliance teams and managed security service providers running compliance for multiple clients. 

StandardFusion fits policy and compliance management for enterprise teams with complex documentation requirements.

Platform
Best For
Relative Cost
Drata
Cloud-native, first SOC 2 / ISO 27001
$$$$
Vanta
Fast-growing SaaS, automation-first
$$$$
ZenGRC
Risk-focused, established programs
$$$
Apptega
Multi-framework, MSSP-managed
$$
StandardFusion
Policy-heavy, enterprise
$$$

What to Look for in a KCM GRC Migration Partner

Beyond tool features, a few criteria should drive the migration decision.

Multi-framework support, not just your current frameworks. Most compliance programs grow. You may be managing SOC 2 today, but a customer will ask for ISO 27001 next year, or a DoD contract will require CMMC. Choose a platform that handles the frameworks you have and the ones you will need, without requiring a platform migration every time your scope expands. 

Control crosswalking. This is the biggest efficiency unlock in modern GRC. If your platform maps controls across frameworks, a single evidence collection event satisfies requirements in SOC 2, NIST CSF, and HIPAA simultaneously. If your platform treats each framework as independent, you are collecting the same evidence multiple times under different labels. Ask any prospective vendor to demonstrate their crosswalking capability specifically.

Continuous vs. point-in-time compliance. KCM GRC required manual updates to stay current. The better replacement platforms monitor control status continuously, meaning you are never blindsided heading into an audit.

Your team's operating model. If you work with an MSSP, or if you are an MSSP managing compliance for multiple clients, the platform architecture matters. Most compliance automation tools are built for a single-tenant, in-house team model. Apptega and a handful of others are specifically designed for multi-client, managed compliance delivery.

How to Execute the Migration

The mechanics of moving off KCM GRC are more straightforward than most organizations expect.

  1. Inventory your current KCM GRC scope. Which frameworks are active? How many controls? What is your evidence collection cadence?
  2. Export what you can. Control lists, risk registers, vendor contact data, policy documents. Get it out of KCM GRC while access persists.
  3. Map to your new platform. A good migration partner will take your KCM framework scopes and show you exactly how they map to the new structure before you commit.
  4. Migrate evidence. For frameworks currently in audit scope, prioritize getting recent evidence into the new system. Historical evidence from KCM GRC can typically be exported as documentation rather than live records.
  5. Run parallel briefly if needed. For organizations with an active audit in progress, a brief period of parallel operation reduces transition risk.

Frequently Asked Questions

When did KnowBe4 KCM GRC reach end of life?

KnowBe4 announced the end of KCM on August 2, 2023. The platform was wound down through 2024.

Is KnowBe4 KCM still available?

No. KnowBe4 KCM GRC reached the end of life in 2024. It is no longer actively developed, supported, or sold. Existing customers were given a migration window and directed toward Drata.

What are  KnowBe4 KCM GRC replacement options?

Replacement  alternatives include Apptega, Vanta, ZenGRC, and StandardFusion, depending on your program's specific needs.

What happened to KnowBe4?

KnowBe4 the company continues to operate as a cybersecurity platform, primarily focused on security awareness training and phishing simulation. What changed is that KnowBe4 exited the GRC software market in 2023 by discontinuing KCM GRC and partnering with Drata for customers needing compliance management tools.

Is KnowBe4 CMMC compliant?

KnowBe4 KCM GRC included CMMC framework templates, but the platform is no longer supported. For current CMMC 2.0 compliance management, organizations need an actively maintained platform. Apptega supports CMMC 2.0 with continuous control monitoring and audit-ready evidence workflows.

Managing your compliance program after KCM GRC? See how Apptega maps to your current frameworks and what a migration looks like.